Wednesday, 21 August 2013

Reefs need relief

When a fragile ecosystem such as a coral reef is left to face the constantly changing and developing world its no surprise really that the coral reef comes off worse. A BBC article from August 2013 states that: 'A recent report revealed that coral coverage on the Great Barrier Reef has declined by as much as 50% in the last three decades, while reefs in the Caribbean have seen reported losses of 80%'.

The statistics are shocking and protecting the coral reefs is something that needs to begin as soon as possible. Some communities are making an effort, for example Simon Reeve on a trip around the Indian Ocean visited The Maldieves where a small increase in ocean temperature is damaging coral reefs. Small scale projects are being run accross the coast line but this particular one involved a metal frame being built which then has live pieces of coral attached before being transfered to a protected area of water. The meta frames can be sponsored by tourists and locals who choose to visit the project. Eventually a web of the metal frames is formed and the coral will stretch across a vast area. The project was run by a local couple who have decided to take protecting the coral in their local area into their own hands. Now more people need to start doing the same. 

The specifics of what damages the coral may not be the most interesting of topics however a number of the reasons for the problems are as follows; firstly ocean acidification. Increasing carbon dioxide emissions affect not only species on land but also those under the water level as well. The ocean has absorbed approximately a third of all anthropogenic carbon emissions in recent years. Increasing levels of carbon dioxide in the water causes the pH to decrease, therefore making the ocean more acidic. The coral struggles to survive in the more acidic conditions and they are not the only organisms to suffer. Due to the decrease in the pH the availability of Carbonite ions is reduced  It has been shown that Carbonite ions play an important role in the forming of shellfish, plankton and of course coral. 

As previously mentioned the damage to the coral in The Maldives was largely due to an increase in ocean temperatures. Coral are very sensitive to even slight changes in temperature. Unfortunately the global sea temperatures around the world are increasing at an alarming rate therefore damaging the coral. When temperatures rise too high coral undergoes a process called Coral Bleeching. The increase in temperature causes autoimmune reactions which causes the coral to expel the algae which usually live within them and provide up to 80% of their energy. This is what gives the coral a white and pale colour. 

The internet is exploding with details of damage to coral reef and as awareness of the issue rises information will be more and more available. An excellent website to visit is: http://www.coral.org/ and here is the recent BBC article which went some way to inspiring this piece: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-23773672


TR

geog on 

Does Aid actually aid the situation?

geog blog #5 

Foreign aid is defined as: 'money, food or other resources given or lent by one country to another'

A fairly broad definition for what can be a complicated topic, does a South South development partnership qualify as aid? Is tied aid beneficial to the countries? Are the countries expected to pay back the aid in which case is it affordable? Does the aid reach the local population or are the countries affected corrupt? What are the intentions of the aid giving countries, are there ulterior motives?These are all factors to be considered and each in turn has its difficulties. 


Tied aid may be a good place to start as this is often the form that a majority of aid is given in. Rather than More Economically Developed Countries (MEDCs) just throwing money at the Governments of LEDCs the aid is offered with some conditions. Often however these conditions are unfair and while the aid may initially may be seen as a good gesture it may have underlying motives. This was the case with The Pergau Dam in Malaysia where work began on the Dam in 1991 and this was funded by the UKs foreign aid budget- £243 million in total. In 1994 during an enquiry the Malaysian Government were found to have purchased £1 billion worth of arms and weapons from the UK. This was an example of how aid was given to be spent on a particular project that had very few benefits for the Malaysian people but did benefit the UK economy. In 2002 tied aid was made illegal in the UK on the grounds of aid should not be given to win export orders or achieve foreign policy goals. So tied aid is not beneficial to the countries who reach it because often the conditions that come attached with it are unsustainable and selfish. 

Does the aid reach the local populations? Sometimes, yes and it's not fair to make the sweeping generalisation that all aid doesn't work. However there are instances when the corruption of a Government means that aid will not reach the population. Ghana. 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013. There have been accusations of Government money being withdrawn and placed into teachers bank accounts however these teachers do not exist, Ghost bank accounts have been created by those within the Government. As a result of this money is passed from foreign Governments to the Ghanaian Government in an effort to improve education standards by improving the pay of teachers, however the money donated never reaches teachers. In fact it never leaves the hands of Government officials. Corruption. Here aid is useless. A recent article can be found here http://www.dailyguideghana.com/?p=89140.

Aid can work and in many scenarios worldwide it becomes a lifeline for those who receive it. However there are situations in which aid does not work and all efforts are futile. 

Follow up reading: Dead Aid by Dambisa Moyo


geog on. 

Friday, 9 November 2012

Tectonics or Vulnerability. Which caused the Boxing Day tsunami 2004 to be the disaster that it was?


geog blog #4


 When you type into Google ‘boxing day tsunami 2004’ you receive 649,000 results in 0.31 seconds.  Trying to figure out what happened to achieve global coverage like this is a near impossibility. At what point does a natural hazard become a natural disaster? At what point does a minor issue become a worldwide problem? At what point does the level of development in the countries affected, become a global priority that needs to be addressed? Trying to answer these questions requires a full analysis of the events that occurred on the 26th December 2004.

There are over 7 billion people in the world and the theory ‘6 Degrees of Separation’ suggests that by a chain of ‘friends of friends’ people could be connected by 6 people or fewer. Despite this the further the two people’s lives are the less likely these connections become.  Therefore when the Boxing Day tsunami happened, proportionally is seems unlikely that if you are living in a developed and Western country far from the troubles of the Pacific that you would know anybody. However the same cannot be said for the people who live there. How can one person not know a single person directly affected and yet another only know people directly affected.

Of course when looking at the number of people affected we are not looking only at those who felt the water and have the strap line  ‘I survived the 2004 tsunami’ with them forever, but also those who are affected by a chain of connections, those people who sit at the very long end of a domino effect and still suffer. The best way to demonstrate this is with my own story; I came from living in Hong Kong and assumed that I would never be part of a vulnerable population, I was wrong.

‘Thailand 2004 The day the water came’.
8.30am: between ordering and the food arriving my sisters and I had run down to the beach to play and pass the time, of course we came back exclaiming about how the beach had grown. Being aged 9, 6 and 4 we were blissfully unaware that the unusually low tide was not something to be excited about but rather was a death trap waiting to happen.

9am: myself, Christie and Kitty were in ‘Kids Club’ drawing, colouring in Aboriginal masks, once Kitty had exhausted all of the fun to be had she asked to return back to Mummy and Daddy, Christie obliged and took her back to a cafe on the beach front  The cafe and the Kids Club ran parallel to the sea along the back of the beach.

Once we had returned to the Kids Club this was the moment that everything changed, ‘RUN.RUN.RUN’ scream the ladies in the kids club, as I look over the small wall, about a metre high I can see the wave, the wave filled not only with water but with screams, debris, and people. As the wave continues to flood in it breaks the barrier designed to keep children in rather than tsunamis out. The kids club lady pushes open a door at the back of the room which reveals a staircase, designed to be used in emergencies leading up to the first floor reception area. The ladies are grabbing children with as many limbs as they can manage and try to collect us all on the stairs.

9.45am: Christie and I are standing in the open fronted lobby looking down at the beach, the restaurant and the mass of people and furniture. We can see what is left of the beach cafe but all we can do is scream at the top of our lungs ‘come to the lobby’. Parts of a traumatic event will stick by you forever and that sentence which I shouted until my lungs had no more air will never leave me. I looked around and all I could hear is screaming. Not the type of screaming when you break a bone or stub your toe. Not the screaming when somebody jumps out and scares you. This is the screaming of confusion and chaos. Nobody is sure of anything, people, places even the direction they are facing.

Suddenly I see my mum running towards us, and in a way that only a mother’s hug can, I was re-assured and I knew that everything would be alright. She told us to sit on the sofa in the lobby and not move whilst she went to find Kitty and my dad. Christie asked me, what had happened, being only 9 I struggled to come up with an answer, however Christie being 7 believed my response as if it were completely true. ‘The Moon and the Sun have had a fight, because the Sun gets to be in the sky during the day when everyone can look at it but the Moon only gets to be in the sky at night when everyone is sleeping. They had a fight and the Sun won, so he pushed the Moon into the sea and it made a big wave.’ Highly unlikely but in the state of confusion anything goes.

It was soon after this that my mum, accompanied by my dad and Kitty came running up the stairs and the family to be re-united. The minutes and hours that directly followed these events all seem a blur. Its hard to remember the calm after the storm and therefore remembering the aftermath of the tsunami is challenging. We were staying in inter-connecting rooms and at a time we were prepared to give up one of our rooms to allow guests without accommodation to have somewhere to call home. We then found out that it wasn't even necessary, the number of guests in the hotel had inevitably decreased.

In the hours that followed anxious guests spoke to the management to try and get whiteboard with information on and bottled water and other food from the first floor store rooms. It was like being an evacuee, there were rations and when your rations had gone that was it. There was no longer a state of panic but a state of uncertainty  with no electricity and no geophysical scientist the origin of the disaster we had just experienced and the possibilities of recurrences were all completely unknown. Thats the story that changed by life, the story that has left me with the strap line ‘I survived the 2004 boxing day tsunami’ and the story that affected millions of people worldwide. ‘


That day and in the days that followed across 14 countries in the Pacific more than 230,000 people were killed. The most devastating effects were felt in Indonesia where officially 131, 028 deaths were recorded however the un-official number could be significantly more. There are a number of factors that affect the vulnerability of a population when looking at tsunami’s. These would include distance from the sea, and the epicentre that sparked the tsunami, level of development i.e. a large building vs. a beach hut, the access to warning systems so that evacuation plans can be implemented, and the finally the people affected. The disaster risk-equation is equalled out to hazard multiplied by vulnerability and then divided by capacity to cope.

The vulnerability of these populations were high, and needless to say that prediction and management strategies were basic if not non-existent, furthermore a combination of the population and tectonics must be held accountable for the events of that day. Needless to say that human beings live in a progressive society, where steps are taken to protect populations in the future and therefore the possibility of a repeat of my story is unexpected. Saying that the planet is an uncontrollable and complex place and as inhabitants of this bizarre land all we can do is prepare for changes and embrace the natural experiences that will be thrown our way.

TR

geog on

Saturday, 3 November 2012

Hurricane Sandy

geog blog #3

Hurricane Sandy is being described as the worst storm to hit the USA in recorded history. The hurricane brewed in the Atlantic Ocean to the East of the USA on the 22nd October 2012 It affected 24 states particularly New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware and New York as well as Vermont and areas of Canada.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-20137363

In New York City (the largest city to be affected) all subways were been closed for 3 days and all public transport suspended. President Obama urged the individuals who were affected to 'take it seriously' already 400 000 New York citizens were evacuated in anticipation of the events that were to follow.  

The storm's effects include the cancellation of the New York Marathon which was set to take place this weekend. It was decided that it would be ridiculous to be handing out free bottled water to the runners when there are individuals living in New Your who have no access to clean water and in some areas no power. Early calculations suggest that Sandy caused the following damages:  

CountryFatalitiesMissingDamage (in USD)Sources
 United States1101$50 billion (estimated)[152][153][154]
 Haiti5421Unknown[155][156]
 Cuba110$80 million[152][157]
 Bahamas20$300 million (estimated)[152][158]
 Canada20Unknown[159][160]
 Dominican Republic20Unknown[152]
 Jamaica10$55.23 million (estimated)[152][161]
 Bermuda00Unknown[152]
Total18222>$50 billion (estimated)


Where this information and the events that occurred are potentially interesting is looking at whether the storm would have had the affects that it did and would have been the magnitude that it was if it wasn't partly sue to global warming and the rapid development of global populations. The individuals who were affected could be classed as a vulnerable population, many areas such as Manhattan are low lying and therefore very susceptible to flooding and storm surges. As well as this the fact that the land is so built up and industrial does not aid the natural removal of water. Water is not able to sink into the ground and flow as groundwater flow but rather it contributes to surface run off and the flooding.

Then global warning, are the frequency and magnitude of hurricanes increasing over time? Hurricane Sandy was the tenth largest Atlantic hurricane on record. Hurricanes form when the warm water is sucked up into a channel which has rotational force due to the Coriolis effect. If water is warmer then more will evaporate and be picked up into the hurricane causing the size to grow. Whilst the link between global warming and hurricanes may be tenuous it cannot be ignored.

Hurricane Sandy came and went over an October half term but for some people it will never be forgotten. 

TR

Geog on

Tuesday, 30 October 2012

USA: the not so 'super' superpower


geog blog #2

There are always so many stories about the decline of the USA, here is just one and then my opinion on the whole thing- this piece was actually written back in August.


With globalisation and the increasing economic interdependency between countries growing; wealth, knowledge and power are becoming more equitably distributed throughout the world. Where in the past the United States of America held practically worldwide dominance, its power is beginning to dwindle. When looking at the concept of 'superpowers' we must look at four key areas, cultural, economic, demographic and military. It is the final aspect of the military that allows a country to begin to achieve 'superpower' status.

In 2011 the USA spent $711 billion on their military out of a worldwide total of only $1630billion. The next highest level of military expenditure was China with a mere $143 billion spent. The difference in military spending is staggering and it is this high level of military spending that allows the USA to achieve full spectrum dominance. By this I mean it holds control of such a large proportion of the global military resources.

There is evidence of not only globalisation but also 'Americanisation' throughout the world. There are McDonald's restaurants in 118 countries worldwide, no other food outlet that could ever challenge this coverage. Looking at the cultural perspective, English has become the global language, there are more native speakers of Spanish and Mandarin than there are of English. However, English is the most spoken language in the world individuals learn it to enable them to engage with people on an international platform.

There are international organisations that represent a multitude of nations on a variety of issues. These include the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the United Nations. The headquarters of the World Bank and IMF are in Washington and the UN in New York City. These political institutions are primarily based in the USA giving some indication of the political power currently held by the USA.

Thus far we can see that the USA has full spectrum dominance, cultural spread like no other country and political power across the globe. Despite this I believe that the USA is on a downward spiral.

The USA currently has debts of $15.85 trillion. This is combined of both public debts and Government debts. Firstly reducing the Government debt, public spending needs to decrease and tax revenue must increase, this will involve running a tight monetary policy so that a situation of fiscal surplus can be achieved. If a situation of fiscal surplus could be achieved then planned Government spending is less than planned tax income and therefore that revenue can be spent in paying off the debts. The largest problem is that with Government spending decreasing, consequently  expenditure on public services will decrease and inevitably involve cuts to the military.  Whilst large cuts must happen to even bring the USA into the same league as other countries when it comes to military spending counties such as China are doing the opposite. The Chinese economy is currently very successful because it is an economy based on manufacturing and producing goods and services. This high level of output gives China a very low unemployment rates and therefore higher levels of tax revenue. This enables China to run a fiscal surplus and is therefore able to increase its spending on public sectors, including the military. Therefore US spending on the military will decrease while simultaneously Chinese expenditure will increase. Therefore the military power currently held by the USA will rapidly drop and other countries could potentially overtake it.

The USA must also look to decrease the private debt held by US citizens. A large proportion of the US population lives a lifestyle which is based on spending and mass consumerism. When these individuals were unable to finance their demand with their own disposable income they turned to credit cards and loans from the banks. In order to decrease the level of public debt the Government must enforce a contractionary fiscal policy which aims to reduce aggregate demand within an economy. This is achieved by raising interest rates which increases the cost of borrowing money and also increases the incentive to save. People then choose to save a higher proportion of their disposable income, so consumption will decrease and aggregate demand falls. As aggregate demand falls US firms and businesses that are dependant on consumers will begin to suffer and will no longer be so successful. This will reduce the company profits, reduce their revenue and decrease their global reach.

The USA must sort out its economy to benefit the citizens and also to keep a sustainable country alive. Reducing its debts will create issues politically, militarily and also culturally. Is it to be expected that in 50 years time it will not be McDonald's restaurants in every country but rather a worldwide recognised Chinese noodle bar?

TR

Geog on

One Water

geog blog #1 


Sitting in the One water offices in London is a pretty inspirational place to be. The simplest way of describing the One Foundation is an ethical water brand. It was founded by Duncan Goose and works on a like for like scheme. By this they mean that if a person in the UK buys a bottle of One Water 100% of the profits from that will go to funding water projects such as pumps in Africa. The same idea runs with their other products, such as eggs. When a box of One eggs is bought in the UK all of the profits go to chicken farms in Africa, or One plasters funding sanitation and healthcare projects- the list goes on.



That probably helps to summarise what One Water do. I can't recommend strongly enough that you subscribe to their YouTube Channel and Watch their videos. May not all 107 of them but as many as you can, they show of the places they have visited, the pumps and farms and projects they have installed but most importantly the people's lives they have changed. 

This work experience links so closely to the AS syllabus with water conflicts. Demand exceeds supply and conflict exists worldwide for water, for example the tensions in the middle East between Israel and Palestine  Tensions over water are a large problem for people across the globe but for over 1 billion people who don't have access to clean, safe water conflict is not the problem. The problem is trying to avoid diseases such as typhoid and cholera which can be fatal and to try and not spend 4-5 hours a day walking to collect the fatal water. 

The problems with water and development in Africa are undeniable but they dont need to be insolvable. Small changes can be made and individuals simply need to consider switching from their normal brands of household goods and services to products from the One Foundation. Do some research and it's a simple switch!

TR   

Geog on